<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Ameriprise - Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C.]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/categories/ameriprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/categories/ameriprise/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:39:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Ameriprise Told to Pay $1.17 Million to Elderly Couple after Unsuitable Real Estate Investment]]></title>
                <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/ameriprise-told-to-pay-1-17-million-to-elderly-couple-after-unsuitable-real-estate-investment/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/ameriprise-told-to-pay-1-17-million-to-elderly-couple-after-unsuitable-real-estate-investment/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[InvestorLawyers]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 04:30:25 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ameriprise]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Suitability]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Albertus Niehuis Jr.]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ameriprise]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ameriprise Financial Services Inc.]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[tenant-in-common investments]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Investors’ rights lawyers are advising senior investors to stay alert when looking at potential investment opportunities. Recently, a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) panel entered an arbitration award in favor of a senior couple against Ameriprise Financial Services Inc. regarding an investment made six years ago. Albertus Niehuis Jr. and his wife Andrea allegedly made&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Investors’ rights lawyers are advising senior investors to stay alert when looking at potential investment opportunities.  Recently,  a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) panel entered an arbitration award in favor of a senior couple against Ameriprise Financial Services Inc. regarding an investment made six years ago.</p>



<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="290" height="174" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.picturerepository.com/pics/InvestorLawyers/475992131Ameriprise_Told_to_Pay_1_17_Million_to_Elderly_Couple_after_Unsuitable_Real_Estate_Investment.jpg?resize=290%2C174" alt="investment fraud laywer"></p>



<p>Albertus Niehuis Jr. and his wife Andrea allegedly made an investment with Ameriprise Financial in early 2008 involving three high-risk tenant-in-common investments in hotels and office complexes. The total investment amount was $1.03 million.  One of these three investments failed completely, and the other two lost significant value.</p>



<p>Fortunately, Niehuis and his wife had the good sense to <a href="/practice-areas/broker-fraud-securities-arbitration/stockbroker-arbitration/">contact a securities arbitration lawyer</a>, and their situation was put in front of a FINRA arbitration panel.  The FINRA panel found that Ameriprise’s investment advice was not appropriate considering the elderly couple’s risk tolerance and ordered Ameriprise to pay $1.17 million to the couple</p>



<p>If you suffered significant losses as a result of doing business with Ameriprise Financial Services Inc. or received an unsuitable recommendation involving high-risk investments from another stockbroker or financial advisor, you may be able to recover your losses through securities arbitration. To find out more about your legal rights and options, <a href="/practice-areas/broker-fraud-securities-arbitration/stockbroker-arbitration/" target="_blank">contact a securities arbitration lawyer at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. </a>at (866) 966-9598 or newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[SELEWACH SENTENCED TO 8-12 YEARS IN PRISON]]></title>
                <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/selewach-sentenced-to-8-12-years-in-prison/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/selewach-sentenced-to-8-12-years-in-prison/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[InvestorLawyers]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 17:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ameriprise]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Hedge Funds]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[IRAs]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[broker fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[broker misconduct]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Shane Selewach, a former Ameriprise Financial Services Inc. broker, has been convicted of stealing nearly $335,000 from clients and sentenced to 8-12 years in prison for broker misconduct. Selewach’s misconduct includes six counts of larceny, six counts of securities fraud and conducting business as an unregistered broker dealer. Selewach was employed with Ameriprise from September&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Shane Selewach, a former Ameriprise Financial Services Inc. broker, has been convicted of stealing nearly $335,000 from clients and sentenced to 8-12 years in prison for <a href="/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">broker misconduct</a>. Selewach’s misconduct includes six counts of larceny, six counts of securities fraud and conducting business as an unregistered broker dealer.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><img decoding="async" src="http://www.picturerepository.com/pics/InvestorLawyers/selewach_sentenced_to_8-12_years_in_prison.png" alt="SELEWACH SENTENCED TO 8-12 YEARS IN PRISON"/></figure>
</div>


<p>Selewach was employed with Ameriprise from September 1997 until he was fired in April 2006. In February of 2008, he was permanently barred from acting as a securities broker by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. His broker misconduct took place between July 2005 and November 2008, during which time he stole nearly $350,000 from six victims. For the last nine months of this time period, he was barred from being a broker but continued to operate as one regardless. Selewach led investors to believe that he was investing their money in hedge funds, commodities and real estate, but in reality he was using it for personal benefit including travel, mortgage payments and sporting event tickets.</p>



<p>During the trial, Selewach’s defense argued that the monies he received were loans rather than “high-interest-rate investments,” according to the <em>Cape Cod Times.</em> Selewach himself testified to this effect. However, victims of his crimes testified otherwise. One of his victims, Patricia Conti, lost more than $150,000 to Selewach. Conti testified that Selewach did not disclose that his departure from Ameriprise was a result of termination, that he continually pressured her and that he asked her to sign documents which she was unable to read fully because they were largely concealed from view.</p>



<p>Conti further testified that at one point, Selewach came to her home with a $30,000/30-day investment opportunity which he said would yield 19 percent interest. Though she told him no, he appeared at her residence, uninvited, multiple times to pressure her about the investment. She finally relented and upon asking for her returns after 30 days, Selewach replied that he said 30 days but actually meant 60 days. When Conti received a letter from the Massachusetts Securities Division asking her about a “loan,” she contacted Selewach, who then said “to go along with the testimony or your money would be in jeopardy.” Fearing financial ruin, Conti did as Selewach instructed.</p>



<p>Originally arrested in September 2009, Selewach now faces 8-12 years in prison followed by another 10 years of probation, during which he is barred from working as a financial custodian or fiduciary. In addition to his prison sentence and probation, Selewach is required to pay full restitution, totaling $335,000, to his victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>