broker misconduct

Published on: November 19, 2013

BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico Ordered to Pay $1.2 Million to Investors

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses as a result of the unsuitable recommendation of investments sold by BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico representatives. Reportedly, a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel recently awarded $1.2 million to claimants Felix Bernard-Diaz, Julian Rodriguez and Luz Rodriguez. The defendants in the hearing were BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico Inc., Rafael Colon Ascar, Jorge Bravo, Sonia Marbarak and Julio Cayere.

BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico Ordered to Pay $1.2 Million to Investors

The claimants asserted gross negligence regarding a naked option trading strategy that was allegedly unsuitable. In addition, they alleged breach of fiduciary duty, churning, margin use and excessive trading.

According to stock fraud lawyers, firms have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given their age, investment objectives and risk tolerance. Churning, on the other hand, is a form of broker misconduct in which the broker performs excessive trading to generate personal profit.

Published on: March 21, 2012

Investors of Guggenheim Shipping ETF Could Recover Losses Through Securities Arbitration

by InvestorLawyers

Investors who suffered losses as a result of their broker’s recommendation of Guggenheim Shipping ETF are seeking the help of investment fraud lawyers in recovering their losses. Guggenheim Shipping ETF is a targeted ETF that tries to track the shipping industry. In general, the shipping industry can be a leveraged play — when there is a strong demand for freight transportation — on the global economy. However, as a result of the decreasing demand for raw materials from emerging markets, the need for shipping services has decreased. Reportedly, the Guggenheim Shipping ETF is down 46 percent, which is bad news for many investors. Luckily, investors who suffered significant losses may have a valid securities arbitration claim.

Investors of Guggenheim Shipping ETF Could Recover Losses Through Securities Arbitration

Brokers, and brokerage firms, have a fiduciary duty to their clients. They must research an investment prior to making a recommendation to an investor, to establish that the investment is suitable. It must be appropriate for each individual investor, taking into consideration the investor’s investment objectives, investment experience, net worth and age. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has a dispute resolution form where investors can settle disputes with their brokerage firms relating to unsuitability and other forms of stock broker fraud.

Brokers have been known to sell ETFs and ETNs as conservative ways to track a sector of the market, or the market as a whole. However, complicated trading strategies are necessary to accomplish this, and using these investments to track a sector of the market may or may not be a conservative trading strategy. This depends on the sector of the market and assets in the account relative to the investment’s concentration level.

Published on: March 15, 2012

Investors of C-Tracks ETN Citi Volatility Index Total Return Could Recover Losses Through Securities Arbitration

by InvestorLawyers

Investors who suffered losses as a result of their broker’s recommendation of C-Tracks ETN Citi Volatility Index Total Return are seeking the help of investment attorneys in recovering those losses. Reportedly, a unique methodology has caused a severe decline in the Volatility ETFdb Category. The C-Tracks ETN Citi Volatility Index Total Return combines short exposure to the S&P 500 Total Return Index to directional exposure of large cap stocks through third and fourth month futures contracts positions on the CBOE Volatility Index. When volatility spiked over the summer, this strategy worked well. However, CVOL has struggled over the long-term. Reportedly, the C-Tracks ETN Citi Volatility Index Total Return is down 48 percent, the most severe decline year-to-date.

Investors of C-Tracks ETN Citi Volatility Index Total Return Could Recover Losses Through Securities Arbitration

Luckily, investors who suffered significant losses may have a valid securities arbitration claim.

Brokers, and brokerage firms, have a fiduciary duty to their clients. They must research an investment prior to making a recommendation to an investor in order to establish that the investment is suitable. It must be appropriate for each individual investor, taking into consideration the investor’s investment objectives, investment experience, net worth and age. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has a dispute resolution form where investors can settle disputes with their brokerage firms relating to unsuitability and other forms of stock broker fraud.

Published on: March 8, 2012

Investors of Reef Oil and Gas Partnership Could Recover Losses

by InvestorLawyers

Investors who suffered losses as a result of a Reef Oil and Gas partnership investment may be able to recover losses through securities arbitration. Investment attorneys are investigating potential claims on behalf of individuals who invested in Reef Oil and Gas partnerships based on the unsuitable recommendations of various broker-dealers. Reef Oil and Gas partnerships are risky and, therefore, not suitable for many investors, especially those with a conservative portfolio.

The general partner of Reef Oil and Gas Companies, Reef Oil & Gas Partners L.P., engages in the developing, producing, and exploiting of oil and natural gas. Furthermore, it operates wells that are, or will be, drilled. Reef Oil and Gas Partners L.P. is based in Richardson, Texas and was founded in 1987.

The substantial risks of oil and gas partnerships make them investments that are only appropriate for sophisticated investors. Nevertheless, many broker-dealers have recommended them to investors for which the investment was unsuitable. Under the rules of fiduciary duty, broker-dealers must adequately disclose the investment’s risks before recommending an investment. Furthermore, they must perform adequate due diligence in determining whether or not the investment is suitable for each investor, given their individual risk tolerance and investment objectives. If a broker does not perform these necessary actions, they have committed broker misconduct in the form of making an unsuitable recommendation and can be penalized and required to return investors’ losses through securities arbitration with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. According to investment attorneys, many brokerage firms appear to have failed to perform due diligence when recommending oil and gas partnership investments to investors.

Published on: March 5, 2012

Stock Broker Misconduct: When Losses are the Result of Fraud

by InvestorLawyers

Sometimes losing money in the stock market and yelling “Fraud!” is a little like smelling smoke and yelling “Fire!” Just as smelling smoke might only mean dinner’s burning, losing money doesn’t always mean stock broker fraud has occurred. It is important for investors to be able to tell the difference between losses resulting from fraud and plain old bad luck. To that end, here are some common types of broker misconduct and tips on how to tell if you’ve been a victim:

Stock Broker Misconduct: When Losses are the Result of Fraud

Unauthorized Trading: Unauthorized trading occurs when a broker makes trades without permission. This is surprisingly common and brokers will often defend their actions by saying that the investor either agreed to the trade or ratified it by raising no objection when they received a confirmation.
Unsuitable Investments: Surprisingly, it is common for brokers to be unable to accurately measure risk. As a result, investors may have a portfolio that is far more risky than is appropriate. Brokers must, by law, take into account the risk tolerance and investment objectives of each client and make suitable recommendations based on those criteria. Unsuitable investments include investments that carry a risk that is not in keeping with the investor’s risk tolerance, as well as inadequate diversification and improper asset allocation. Churning, which generates excessive commissions through excessive trading, is also a form of unsuitable investments. Investors who suspect the trading on their account is excessive will most likely have to consult an investment attorney for an analysis of their portfolio.

Published on: March 2, 2012

News: FINRA Files Complaint Against Ex-broker

by InvestorLawyers

On February 9, 2012, ex-broker James Scott McKee was charged with aggravated theft in the first degree. As a result of his broker misconduct, McKee faces four charges of theft. In addition, a complaint has been filed against him with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). McKee was formally affiliated with LPL Financial LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Berthel Fischer & Co. Financial Services Inc. According to the complaint filed with FINRA, McKee’s victims included a local church, an 81-year-old retiree and other unsophisticated investors.

McKee convinced an LPL client to invest $400,000. This investment took place in April 2007 and was put into a real estate venture. However, according to the FINRA complaint, McKee failed to notify or receive approval from LPL for the venture. Following a heart attack, which subjected the investor to significant medical expenses, she contacted McKee to have her money returned. McKee received two checks for $200,000 in February 2008 but failed to return the money to the investor. Instead, he told the client the funds remained invested and then used them for his own use. The money has not yet been returned to the client.

According to the police statement on the matter, McKee “committed aggravated theft by deception and fraud with respect to securities or securities business” from February 2008 to the present. According to Oregon officials, McKee sold unregistered securities, conducted unauthorized liquidation of investment account monies, concealed the liquidation and made an unauthorized deposit of said funds into his personal bank account.

Published on: March 1, 2012

FINRA Investor Alert: Inspecting Account Statements Helps Investors Detect Securities Fraud

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud often goes undetected because investors either don’t understand or don’t closely inspect their account statements from their securities firm. On February 23, 2012, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) issued a new Investor Alert called “It Pays to Understand Your Brokerage Account Statements and Trade Confirmations.” This Investor Alert is designed to help investors to better understand their account statements. A careful inspection of account statements can help investors detect errors and broker misconduct, including overcharges and unauthorized transactions.

FINRA Investor Alert: Inspecting Account Statements Helps Investors Detect Securities Fraud

FINRA’s Vice President for Investor Education, Gerri Walsh, in a FINRA press release about the Investor Alert stated, “Investors whose portfolios have taken a hit might not be keen to open their account statements, but investors should review their statements carefully. Investors should also review trade confirmations as soon as they receive them because a single keystroke can make the difference between 100 and 1,000 shares.”

The Investor Alert uses plain language to detail to investors their account statements’ key elements and “red flags” that could indicate to investors that misconduct or mistakes may have occurred. Investors should also look for their investment objective, which is listed on many account statements. This investment objective will indicate the investor’s strategy and will contain words such as “conservative” or “growth.” This description – and the account activity – should accurately reflect the goals of the investor.

Published on: February 29, 2012

Investors Recovering TIC Investment Losses Through Securities Arbitration

by InvestorLawyers

There has been a recent series of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) securities arbitration rulings in which panels have sided with investors who sustained losses because of TIC exchanges. TIC, or tenant-in-common, investments involve tax-deferred exchanges of property ownership interests. In the majority of these arbitration awards, the sale of TICs, along with other products, came from DBSI Inc. DBSI raised almost $1 billion from around 140 separate deals prior to its bankruptcy declaration in 2008.

Investors Recovering TIC Investment Losses Through Securities Arbitration

Securities Arbitration Commentator research and InvestmentNews reports indicate that $12.6 million in cases involving DBSI’s direct broker-dealer sales of TICs have been filed with FINRA.

LPL Financial LLC has also faced a FINRA panel because of TIC investments. Heinrich and Araceli Hardt, both 76 from San Diego, California, purchased two TIC exchanges from David Glenn, an LPL broker. According to the Hardts’ allegations, LPL and Glenn’s broker misconduct included elder abuse and securities fraud. On February 10, the FINRA panel awarded the Hardts $1.4 million. Claims were also filed on behalf of the Hardts against Orchard Securities LLC and Meridian Capital Partners. However, the claims against Meridian Capital and Orchard Securities were dismissed by the Hardts in December.

Published on: February 15, 2012

Charles Schwab Charged with Violating FINRA Rules in Customer Agreements

by InvestorLawyers

On February 1, 2012, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced that it had filed a complaint against Charles Schwab & Company. FINRA charged the firm with violating FINRA rules when it required the waiving of rights of customers to bring class actions against the firm. It is the belief of many investment attorneys, investors and others in the securities industry that investors should retain the right to file class actions against the firm in the event that broker misconduct occurs.

Charles Schwab Charged with Violating FINRA Rules in Customer Agreements

According to the complaint issued by FINRA, Charles Schwab is charged with amending its customer agreement in October 2011 to include a provision that required customers to waive their rights that allowed them to bring or participate in class actions against the firm. The amended agreements were sent to nearly 7 million customers.

Furthermore, the agreement included a provision that required customers to agree that, in arbitration proceedings, arbitrators would not be able to consolidate the claims of multiple parties. According to FINRA, both provisions are in violation of FINRA rules of language or conditions that may be placed in customer agreements by firms.

Published on: February 13, 2012

Broker Misconduct: Illegal Transfer of Funds Through Email Hacks

by InvestorLawyers

On January 27, 2012, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) issued an Investor Alert warning investors of fraudsters compromising investor email accounts to send trading instructions as a way to commit fraud. According to FINRA, fraudsters will use the email account to gain access to information that they can then use to request wire transfers to overseas accounts. Because this form of fraud can be committed by stock brokers and traders, stock broker fraud attorneys are encouraging defrauded investors to come forward with potential claims.

Broker Misconduct: Illegal Transfer of Funds Through Email Hacks

In some cases, firms failed to verify the instructions via telephone but released the funds anyway. This violation in procedure may entitle defrauded investors to a recovery of losses through securities arbitration. According to the SEC, four brokerage firms have been charged for allowing traders to trade in the U.S. securities market, despite the fact that they were unregistered. In the same case, Igors Nagaicevs, a trader, was charged with making $874,896 through unauthorized purchases and sales. He also broke into accounts 159 times from 2009 to August 2010. According to the SEC, he cost investors possibly over $2 million.

“Nagaicevs engaged in a brazen and systematic securities fraud, repeatedly raiding brokerage accounts and causing massive damages to innocent investors,” says the director of the SEC’s San Francisco regional office, Marc J. Fagel.