As recently reported by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), investments in so-called private placements have experienced a substantial upswing in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. In fact, according to a May 7, 2018 WSJ article entitled, A Private-Market Deal Gone Bad: Sketchy Brokers, Bilked Seniors and a Cosmetologist, “In 2017 alone, private placements using brokers totaled at least $710 billion … a nearly threefold increase rise from 2009.” Of considerable concern, the article indicates that that financial advisors recommending private placements are “six times as likely as the average broker to report at least one regulatory action against them…” and, moreover, that 1 in 8 brokers recommending private placement investments have “three or more red flags on their records, such as investor complaint, regulatory action, criminal charge or firing… .”

In response to growing concerns about the many risks and pitfalls associated with private placements, some securities regulators have stepped up their efforts to combat the problem. For example, on July 2, 2018, the Massachusetts Securities Division (the “Division”) announced its investigation into sales practices linked to private placement investments. Pursuant to the Division’s investigation – which will be spearheaded by Mr. William Galvin, the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts – a total of 10 broker-dealers will be subjected to regulatory inquiry. These brokerage firms, which have a demonstrated history of sales practice abuse surrounding private placement investments, include: LPL Financial, Arthur W. Wood Company, Santander Securities, U.S. Boston Capital, Bolton Global Capital, Advisory Group Equity Services, Moors & Cabot, Inc., Detwiler Fenton & Co., BTS Securities, and Winslow, Evans & Crocker.

In connection with its investigation, the Division is seeking to examine firms and advisors with disciplinary reports on file from 2 years ago, when the Division surveyed over 200 brokerage firms regarding their hiring and disciplinary practices. According to Mr. Galvin: “Private placements are risky investments that reward the salesperson handsomely with high commissions. Firms offering these to the public, especially seniors, have an obligation to see that they are sold to benefit the investor, not the broker. Individuals with a history of disciplinary actions magnify the risk of unsuitable sales in connection with private placements.”

As a general rule, investing in a private placement carries with it complexity and considerable risk — including high commissions, lack of transparency, and the illiquid nature of the unregistered offering — and, therefore, is most typically only available to accredited and/or sophisticated investors. An investor is considered “accredited” if he or she has an annual income of over $200,000 or has a net worth of more than $1 million of assets (excluding one’s primary residence). It is a financial advisor’s responsibility to ensure that an investor meets this test.

Financial advisors, and by extension their brokerage firm, have a duty to perform adequate due diligence on any investment recommended to customers, including private placement offerings pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated by the SEC. Furthermore, financial advisors have a duty to disclose the risks associated with such an investment, as well as conduct a suitability analysis to determine if an investment meets an investor’s stated investment objectives and associated risk profile.

The attorneys at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. have significant experience in representing investors who have incurred losses in connection with private placement offerings, including investments in oil and gas drilling funds, hedge funds, and other exempt offerings. Investors may contact a securities arbitration attorney at (866) 966-9598 or via email at newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.

Paul Wescoe Smith, formerly associated with Bolton Global Capital, was the subject of a civil action and a criminal indictment filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, through the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, on December 7, 2017. Smith, age 63, a resident of Wayne, Pennsylvania, has been accused of misconduct in connection with the sale and operation of a Ponzi scheme known as the Haverford Group.

Smith worked in the securities industry as a registered representative of several brokerage firms from 1982 until 2017, including with Bolton Global Capital from May 2007 to February 2017. Smith allegedly sold unregistered securities in a purported hedge fund known as The Haverford Group to more than a dozen investors.

Bolton Global Capital, Smith’s employer, reportedly notified Smith’s customers in early 2017 that their accounts were being transferred to another “financial representative” but reportedly gave no indication that Smith had been terminated and accused of wrongdoing in connection with The Haverford Group.

The SEC Complaint alleges that Smith raised approximately $2.35 million for The Haverford Group from approximately 30 unwitting investors, including some of his Bolton Global Capital customers. Smith allegedly told investors that the purported hedge fund would invest in publicly-traded securities. However, in reality, the purported hedge fund allegedly was in the nature of a Ponzi scheme, with the proceeds of new investments being used to repay earlier investors and for Smith’s own personal use. Smith reportedly attracted elderly and unsophisticated investors to his purported fund, including some members of his own country club.

Smith allegedly created account statements that were not authentic to send to customers, and wrote at least $247,400 worth of checks to himself from Haverford’s checking account, which he deposited into his personal bank accounts and used for personal expenses.

Bolton Global Capital has reportedly denied responsibility for Smith’s actions in response to a customer claim, and indicated that his activities were unauthorized. However, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules have established that firms must properly supervise brokers’ activities while they are registered with the firm. If they fail to do so, the firms can be held responsible for the activities of their representatives and, thus, could be ordered to compensate their clients for losses sustained for the period they were registered with the firm.

Investors who lost money as a result of recommendations to purchase purported securities of the Haverford Group may be able to recover investment losses in FINRA arbitration or through litigation if they were customers of Bolton Global Capital. Investors may contact a securities arbitration attorney at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. at (866) 966-9598 or newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.