<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[illiquid investments - Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C.]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/tags/illiquid-investments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/tags/illiquid-investments/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 17:49:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Claims Against Berthel Fisher for Unsuitable Sale of Alternative Investments Begin]]></title>
                <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/claims-against-berthel-fisher-for-unsuitable-sale-of-alternative-investments-begin/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/claims-against-berthel-fisher-for-unsuitable-sale-of-alternative-investments-begin/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[InvestorLawyers]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 04:30:42 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[ETF]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fisher Investments]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Suitability]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Berthel Fisher]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Cornerstone Core Properties REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Gulf Coast Rig & Equipment]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[illiquid investments]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Inland American Real Estate Trust]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[inverse ETFs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jonathan Pyne]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Leaf Equipment Leasing Income Fund III]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Leveraged ETFs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Non-Traded REITs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[REEF Oil & Gas Income and Development]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Unsuitable Sale of Alternative Investments]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Wells REIT]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Our recent blog post, “Berthel Fisher and Affiliate Fined Regarding Sales of ETFs and Non-Traded REITs,” reported that in February the firm had been fined $775,000 by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). The FINRA fines addressed alleged supervisory failures, including failure to properly supervise the sale of alternative investments like leveraged and inverse exchange-traded&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Our recent blog post, “<a href="https://www.investorlawyers.net/berthel-fisher-affiliate-fined-regarding-sales-of-etfs-and-non-traded-reits/">Berthel Fisher and Affiliate Fined Regarding Sales of ETFs and Non-Traded REITs</a>,” reported that in February the firm had been fined $775,000 by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). The FINRA fines addressed alleged supervisory failures, including failure to properly supervise the sale of alternative investments like leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs). One claim has already been filed by <a href="/practice-areas/broker-fraud-securities-arbitration/stockbroker-arbitration/" target="_blank">investment fraud lawyers</a> on behalf of a retired woman in Minnesota.</p>



<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="290" height="174" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.picturerepository.com/pics/InvestorLawyers/467619585Claims_Against_Berthel_Fisher_for_Unsuitable_Sale_of_Alternative_Investments_Begin.jpg?resize=290%2C174" alt="Claims Against Berthel Fisher for Unsuitable Sale of Alternative Investments Begin"></p>



<p>According to the claim, the woman was sold non-traded REITs and other alternative investments by Jonathan Pyne, a broker for Berthel Fisher. The claim argues that her age and low risk tolerance made the investments unsuitable for her. The investments included:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Inland American Real Estate Trust</li>



<li>Wells REIT</li>



<li>Cornerstone Core Properties REIT</li>



<li>Gulf Coast Rig & Equipment</li>



<li>REEF Oil & Gas Income and Development</li>



<li>Leaf Equipment Leasing Income Fund III</li>
</ul>



<p>Securities arbitration lawyers say that these investments are illiquid and, in many cases, may have been negligently misrepresented. In this woman’s case and possibly many others, the investments also allegedly represented a concentration level of her liquid net worth that was too large to be suitable.</p>



<p>Firms have an obligation to properly supervise their brokers and fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given their age, investment objectives and risk tolerance.</p>



<p>Non-traded REITs are attractive to investors because they carry a relatively high dividend or interest. According to investment fraud lawyers, however, these investments are inherently risky and illiquid, which limits access of funds to investors and makes them unsuitable for many individuals with conservative risk tolerances and those who need easy access to funds, especially when over-concentrated. Leveraged and inverse ETFs are designed to meet daily objectives, and “reset” each day. As a result, the performance of these investments can diverge from the performance of the underlying benchmark or index very quickly, and the problem is exasperated in volatile markets, making these investments unsuitable for many investors as well.</p>



<p>If you were sold unsuitable alternative investments from a Berthel Fisher broker, including non-traded REITs, inverse and leveraged ETFs and/or Oil & Gas Partnerships, you may be able to recover your losses through a securities arbitration claim. <a href="/practice-areas/broker-fraud-securities-arbitration/stockbroker-arbitration/" target="_blank">To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact a securities arbitration lawyer </a>at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. at (866) 966-9598 or newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[$7 Million Awarded to Investor in FINRA Auction-rate Securities Dispute]]></title>
                <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/7-million-awarded-to-investor-in-finra-auction-rate-securities-dispute/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/7-million-awarded-to-investor-in-finra-auction-rate-securities-dispute/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[InvestorLawyers]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 04:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Auction Rate Securities (ARS)]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[J.P. Morgan]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Morgan Keegan]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Suitability]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[illiquid investments]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jeffries Group]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jeffries Group LLC]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Leucadia National Corp.]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[securities fraud attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[stock fraud lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Investors who suffered significant losses as a result of their auction-rate securities investment with Jeffries Group LLC may be able to obtain a recovery via FINRA securities arbitration. Jeffries Group is a subsidiary of Leucadia National Corp., another full-service brokerage firm. Recently, Jeffries was ordered to pay an investor $7 million regarding an auction-rate securities&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Investors who suffered significant losses as a result of their auction-rate securities investment with Jeffries Group LLC may be able to obtain a recovery via FINRA securities arbitration. Jeffries Group is a subsidiary of Leucadia National Corp., another full-service brokerage firm. Recently, Jeffries was ordered to pay an investor $7 million regarding an auction-rate securities dispute.</p>


<p>In May 2012, a statement of claim was filed with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority by Saddlebag LLC. The claim alleges that the firm wrongfully invested the client’s assets in illiquid auction-rate securities (ARS). According to securities lawyers, many financial firms sold auction-rate securities as short-term instruments with a highly-liquid nature, much like money market funds.</p>


<p>However, in 2008, the credit crunch resulted in a failure of the ARS market and investors with a piece of the $330 billion market were stuck holding securities that they were unable to sell. Other firms, including Morgan Keegan, have been accused of misleading investors regarding the liquidity risk of auction-rate securities.</p>


<p>Auction-rate securities are tax-exempt, long-term and taxable bonds and their interest rates are connected to the short-term market. Through ARS, issuers can acquire lower short-term rates on long-term financing. Auction-rate securities were marketed as liquid cash alternatives and considered safe before the global credit crunch.</p>


<p>Firms and their registered representatives have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation. According to Thompson Reuters, leading auction-rate securities underwriters included Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, UBS, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, Merrill, RBC and Wachovia.</p>


<p>If illiquid investments were unsuitable for you given your age, investment objectives and risk tolerance and you suffered significant losses in the auction-rate securities market, you may have a valid securities arbitration claim. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact a stock fraud lawyer at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. at (866) 966-9598 or by e-mail at newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>