KBS I launched through its initial public offering (“IPO”) in early 2006 for issuance of up to 200 million shares. Through its IPO at $10 per share, KBS I raised $1.7 billion prior to closing in May 2008. The company’s portfolio includes nearly 200 properties, in addition to participation in various real estate loan receivables.

KBS I has gradually written down its estimated share value over the years, but no liquidity event has yet provided a public market that would establish the true value of KBS I shares. One secondary market that provides a limited platform for investors in non-traded REITs, Central Trade & Transfer, has recently listed shares of KBS I with a bid-ask spread of $1.90 – $1.80 a share, suggesting that investors in KBS I may have suffered principal losses of as much as 80% on their initial investments of $10.00 a share.

If you have invested in KBS I, or another non-traded REIT, and you have suffered losses in connection with your investment (or are currently unable to exit your illiquid investment position without incurring considerable losses), you may be able to recover your losses in FINRA arbitration. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact a securities arbitration lawyer at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. at (866) 966-9598 or via email at newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.

Non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) are investments that pose a significant risk that the investor will lose some or all of his initial investment. Non-traded REITs are not listed on a national securities exchange, limiting investors’ ability to sell them after the initial purchase. Such illiquid and risky investments are often better suited for sophisticated and institutional investors, rather than retail investors such as retirees who do not wish to have their money tied up for years, or risk losing a significant portion of their investment. Non-traded REITs usually have higher fees for investors than publicly-traded REITs and can be harder to sell.

A partial list of non-traded REITs is as follows (not all of the REITs listed have performed poorly):

American Realty Capital – Retail Centers of America, Inc.

American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value Trust, Inc.

American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.

American Realty Capital Hospitality Trust, Inc.

American Realty Capital New York City REIT, Inc.

American Realty Capital Trust V, Inc.

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT I

Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II

Carey Watermark Investors Incorporated

Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT

CNL Growth Properties

CNL Healthcare Properties Inc.

CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc.

Cole Credit Property Trust IV, Inc.

Cole Credit Property Trust V, Inc.

Cole Office & Industrial REIT

Cole Real Estate Income Strategy (Daily NAV), Inc.

Corporate Property Associates 17 – Global, Inc.

Corporate Property Associates 18 – Global

Dividend Capital Diversified Property Fund Inc.

Global Income Trust, Inc.

Griffin Capital Essential Asset REIT, Inc.

Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III

GTJ REIT, Inc.

Hines Global REIT, Inc.

Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.

Industrial Income Trust, Inc.

Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.

InvenTrust Properties Corp.

Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc.

KBS Legacy Partners Apartment REIT, Inc.

KBS Real Estate Investment Trust I, Inc.

KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc.

KBS Real Estate Investment Trust III

KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc.

Northstar Healthcare Income, Inc.

Northstar Real Estate Income II, Inc.

Northstar Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.

Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc.

Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT II, Inc.

Realty Finance Trust, Inc.

RREEF Property Trust

Steadfast Income REIT

Strategic Realty Trust Inc.

TIER REIT Inc.

United Realty Trust, Inc.

Brokers and financial advisors are required to make investment recommendations that are consistent with their clients’ risk tolerance, net worth, investment objectives and experience in the market. However, due to the high sales commissions brokers typically earn for selling REITs – as high as 15%- brokers can be tempted to make “one size fits all” recommendations to investors in order to reap commissions. These high up-front fees and commissions can negatively affect performance over time, as illustrated by the estimated $50 billion that non-traded REITs have cost customers.

If you have suffered significant losses as a result of unsuitable recommendations of non-traded REITs or other non-conventional investments by a stockbroker or financial advisor, you may have a valid securities arbitration claim. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact an investor rights attorney at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. at (866) 966-9598 or newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.

Inland American is an enormous company- the largest of the giant non-traded REITS. The Company had raised a total of approximately $8.0 billion of gross offering proceeds as of December 31, 2008.

Inland American is a non-traded REIT, meaning that its shares are not listed on a national securities exchange. However, sales of shares in non-traded REITs, which file periodic reports with the Securities Exchange Commission as do listed companies, are not limited to accredited investors and shares are sold to the general public through brokers.

Non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) are highly risky products that pose a significant risk that the investor will lose some or all of his initial investment. Non-traded REITs are not listed on a national securities exchange, limiting investors’ ability to sell them after the initial purchase. Such illiquid and risky investments are often better suited for sophisticated and institutional investors, rather than retail investors such as retirees who do not wish to have their money tied up for years, or risk losing a significant portion of their investment.

Brokers and financial advisors are required to make investment recommendations that are consistent with their clients’ risk tolerance, net worth, investment objectives and experience in the market. However, due to the high sales commissions brokers typically earn for selling REITs – as high as 15%- brokers can be tempted to make “one size fits all” recommendations to investors in order to reap commissions. Brokerage firms are required by FINRA rules to supervise brokers and investment advisors- even those who work in independent branch offices- to ensure that the brokers make only suitable recommendations.

If you have suffered significant losses as a result of unsuitable recommedations of REITs or other non-conventional investments by a stockbroker or financial advisor, you may have a valid securities arbitration claim. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact an investor rights attorney at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. at (866) 966-9598 or newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.

Alternative investments can include a variety of products, including oil and gas partnerships, hedge funds, non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs), business development companies (BDCs) and other related categories. Though LPL Financial set forth guidelines to manage investment concentration, FINRA reports that from January 2008 until July 2012, there was no internal effort to enforce these guidelines. As a result, some clients may have received investment advice that resulted in levels of concentration that were excessive.

If you suffered significant losses as a result of an unsuitable recommendation to purchase or over-concentrate your portfolio in non-conventional investments (whether from LPL or another stockbroker or financial advisor), you may be able to recover your losses through securities arbitration. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact a securities arbitration lawyer at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. at (866) 966-9598 or newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.

These investments included:

• Non-traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs
• Oil and gas partnerships
• Business development companies, or BDCs
• Hedge funds
• Managed futures
• Other illiquid pass-through investments

For many alternative investments, offering documents, state regulations and the firms themselves impose concentration limits. FINRA’s investigation found that LPL did not adequately supervise alternative investment sales from January 1, 2008 to July 1, 2012 and, as a result, these concentration limits were allegedly violated. In addition, LPL’s supervisory staff allegedly was not adequately trained in analyzing suitability standards.

According to stock fraud lawyers, firms have an obligation to properly supervise their brokers and fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations. In addition, those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given their age, investment objectives and risk tolerance. Securities fraud attorneys believe that many LPL customers may be able to recover losses for unsuitable alternative investments.

“In order to sell alternative investments, a broker-dealer must tailor its supervisory system to these products,” FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement Brad Bennett stated. “LPL exposed customers to unacceptable risks by not having an adequate system in place that could accurately review whether a transaction complies with suitability requirements imposed by the states, the product issuers and the firm itself — and it failed to train its registered representatives to apply all the suitability guidelines appropriately.”

If you were an LPL customer who received an unsuitable recommendation of non-traded REITs, oil and gas partnerships, managed futures, BDCs or other illiquid investments, you may have a valid securities arbitration claim. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact a stock fraud lawyer at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. at (866) 966-9598 or newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.

Reportedly, from January until May 2013, investors spent $10.3 billion on real estate funds. However, in May 2013, the Federal Reserve began discussing tapering its purchase of assets under the so-called “quantitative easing” policy, causing a spike in interest rates, and REITs suffered a loss of 5.9 percent in that month alone. As prices fell, investors pulled $2.5 billion out of REITs, suffering significant losses. Then, last month, the Federal Reserve tapered its bond-buying program from $85 billion per month to $75 billion per month.

According to a Wall Street Journal article last month, “You should own REITs because you want to diversify some of the risks of stocks and bonds and to combat inflation — not because you are chasing high dividend yields or because you think the hot returns of the past will persist.” The articles goes on to say, “Anyone who overpays for lower-quality, higher-yielding assets could be crushed if interest rates rise sharply.”

According to securities arbitration lawyers, firms and brokers have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given their age, investment objectives and risk tolerance. Investment fraud lawyers believe that many investors may have received unsuitable recommendations of real estate investment trusts, or that their portfolios may have been unsuitably over-concentrated in REITs.

If you suffered significant losses because of the unsuitable recommendation or over-concentration of REITs, you may have a valid Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration claim. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact a securities arbitration lawyer at Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. at (866) 966-9598 or newcases@investorlawyers.net for a no-cost, confidential consultation.