<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Whitestone REIT - Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C.]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/tags/whitestone-reit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/tags/whitestone-reit/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 23:43:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Recovery of Whitestone REIT Losses]]></title>
                <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/recovery-of-whitestone-reit-losses/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/recovery-of-whitestone-reit-losses/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[InvestorLawyers]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 04:30:38 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Unregistered Securities]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Hartman Commercial Properties REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment fraud lawyers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[REIT losses]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Whitestone REIT]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Investors of Whitestone REIT are attempting to recover their REIT losses through Financial Industry Regulatory Authority securities arbitration. First offered in 2004 as a public, non-traded REIT under the name Hartman Commercial Properties REIT, shares of the investment were offered at a per share price valuation of $10. Until a statement in 2009, which informed&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Investors of Whitestone REIT are attempting to <a href="https://www.investorlawyers.net/fraud-sales-of-reit-non-traded-reit/" target="_blank">recover their REIT losses</a> through Financial Industry Regulatory Authority securities arbitration. First offered in 2004 as a public, non-traded REIT under the name Hartman Commercial Properties REIT, shares of the investment were offered at a per share price valuation of $10. Until a statement in 2009, which informed investors that the value of Whitestone REIT had declined to a per share price of only $5.15, investors were unaware of any problems with the REIT.</p>

<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img decoding="async" alt="Recovery of Whitestone REIT Losses" src="http://www.picturerepository.com/pics/InvestorLawyers/Recovery_of_whitestone_REIT_losses.png" style="width:302px;height:182px" /></figure></div>


<p>On May 1, 2009, Jack L. Mahaffey, Independent Trustee, Chairman of Compensation Committee and Chairman of Special Committee for Whitestone REIT, issued a letter to shareholders. This statement revealed the $5.15 valuation was considered by Western Reserve Partners, a real estate investment banking firm which was engaged to review Whitestone’s internal management analysis, to be “on the high side of the range of reasonableness for current valuation.”</p>


<p>The letter to shareholders also addressed the question of why investors’ dividends had been reduced despite the fact that they were led to expect a dividend of 7 percent. In addressing this question, Mahaffey stated that “Whitestone had established a pattern of making cash distributions in excess of its FFO and available cash flow, a practice generally avoided by listed REITs.”</p>


<p>“We are facing a tough operating environment in today’s economic recession, with some of our tenants going bankrupt and others having to ask for rent concessions or space reductions just to make ends meet,” the letter continues.</p>


<p>In many cases, brokerage firms and broker-dealers may be held responsible for investor REIT losses when the investment was recommended despite its unsuitability for a client, given that client’s age, investment objectives and risk tolerance. Non-traded REITs like Whitestone REIT are often inherently risky and illiquid and, thus, unsuitable for many investors.</p>


<p>If you suffered significant REIT losses as a result of your investment in Whitestone REIT, you may be able to recover your losses through securities arbitration. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact an investment fraud lawyer at The Law Office of Christopher J. Gray at (866) 966-9598 for a no-cost, confidential consultation.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[FINRA Targets Non-traded REITs]]></title>
                <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/finra-targets-non-traded-reits/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/finra-targets-non-traded-reits/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[InvestorLawyers]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Private Placements]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Suitability]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Apple REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[ArciTerra National REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Behringer Harvard REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[CNL Lifestyle Properties REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Cornerstone Healthcare REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Desert Capital REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Dividend Capital REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Inland American]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Inland Western]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment fraud lawyers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[KBS REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Paladin Realty Income Properties REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[stock fraud lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[TNP Strategic Retail Trust]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Wells REIT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Whitestone REIT]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>According to stock fraud lawyers, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has and will continue to relentlessly target non-traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs. Specifically, the regulatory authority is focusing on how broker-dealers sell these investments and potential shortcomings in their strategies. According to the Executive Vice President of Member Regulation Sales Practices at FINRA,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>According to <a href="/practice-areas/broker-fraud-securities-arbitration/stockbroker-arbitration/" target="_blank">stock fraud lawyers</a>, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has and will continue to relentlessly target non-traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs. Specifically, the regulatory authority is focusing on how broker-dealers sell these investments and potential shortcomings in their strategies. According to the Executive Vice President of Member Regulation Sales Practices at FINRA, Susan Axelrod, examiners at FINRA have been scrutinizing “numerous retail sellers of non-traded REITs.” Axelrod also stated that, “In several instances, FINRA examiners have found that firms selling these products failed to conduct reasonable diligence before selling a product and failed to make a determination that the product was suitable for investors.”</p>

<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img decoding="async" alt="FINRA Targets Non-traded REITs" src="http://www.picturerepository.com/pics/InvestorLawyers/FINRA_targets_non_traded_REITs.png" style="width:302px;height:182px" /></figure></div>


<p>Investment fraud lawyers note that independent broker-dealers have a responsibility to perform adequate due diligence when selling any investment, especially complex, illiquid products. Since the 2008 market collapse, FINRA has been aggressive with broker-dealers who failed to do so. Axelrod stated to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association’s Complex Products Forum that, “FINRA examiners have noted that in the instances of REITs that have experienced financial difficulties, red flags existed and should have been considered by firms prior to the product being offered to firm clients.”</p>


<p>Another problem with non-traded REITs, according to Axelrod, is that “non-traded REITs may also borrow funds to make distributions if operating cash flow is insufficient, and excessive borrowing may increase the risk of default or devaluation. In addition, non-traded-REIT distributions may actually be a return on principal.”</p>


<p>Some of the non-traded REITs currently being investigated by the stock fraud lawyers at Christopher J. Gray are Inland Western, Inland American, KBS REIT, Cornerstone Healthcare REIT, Behringer Harvard REIT, Paladin Realty Income Properties REIT, Wells REIT, Apple REIT, Desert Capital REIT, TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Dividend Capital REIT, Whitestone REIT, ArciTerra National REIT and CNL Lifestyle Properties REIT.</p>


<p>If you suffered significant losses as a result of your investment in a non-traded REIT, you may be able to recover your losses through securities arbitration. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact an investment fraud lawyer at The Law Office of Christopher J. Gray at (866) 966-9598 for a no-cost, confidential consultation.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Investors of Whitestone REIT Could Recover Losses]]></title>
                <link>https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/investors-of-whitestone-reit-could-recover-losses/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.investorlawyers.net/blog/investors-of-whitestone-reit-could-recover-losses/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[InvestorLawyers]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 04:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Suitability]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment fraud lawyers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[securities arbitration lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Whitestone REIT]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Investment fraud lawyers are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered losses as a result of their investment in Whitestone REIT. Whitestone REIT was previously known as Hartman Commercial Properties REIT, and was a non-traded, publicly offered REIT. Shares of Hartman REIT were first offered to investors in 2004 through stock brokerage firms.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><a href="/practice-areas/broker-fraud-securities-arbitration/stockbroker-arbitration/" target="_blank">Investment fraud lawyers</a> are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered losses as a result of their investment in Whitestone REIT. Whitestone REIT was previously known as Hartman Commercial Properties REIT, and was a non-traded, publicly offered REIT. Shares of Hartman REIT were first offered to investors in 2004 through stock brokerage firms. A 2009 statement informed investors that Whitestone REIT’s value had declined by around 50 percent. Many investors were unaware of any problems with their investment until this 2009 announcement.</p>

<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter is-resized"><img decoding="async" alt="Investors of Whitestone REIT Could Recover Losses" src="http://www.picturerepository.com/pics/InvestorLawyers/Investors_of_Whitestone_REIT_could_recover_losses.png" style="width:302px;height:182px" /></figure></div>


<p>Whitestone REIT started trading on the New York Stock Exchange in 2010, but securities arbitration lawyers say the shares are still trading at significantly lower prices than what most investors paid. Non-traded REIT investments like the Whitestone REIT typically offer commissions between 7-10 percent, which is significantly higher than traditional investments like mutual funds and stocks. In some cases, the commission generated by these investments can be as high as 15 percent. This higher commission can explain why brokerage firms are motivated to recommend these investments despite their possible unsuitability. </p>


<p>Investment fraud lawyers are investigating the possibility that brokerage firms may be held liable for the recommendation of Whitestone REIT. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules have established that brokers and firms have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given their age, investment objectives and risk tolerance. Non-traded REITs like this one are illiquid and inherently risky and, therefore, not suitable for many investors.</p>


<p>If you purchased the Whitestone REIT, or another risky, non-traded REIT, you may be able to recover your losses through securities arbitration. To find out more about your legal rights and options, contact a securities arbitration lawyer at The Law Office of Christopher J. Gray at (866) 966-9598 for a no-cost, confidential consultation.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>