Justia Lawyer Rating - Badge
NYSTLA - Badge
Avvo Rating - Badge
American Association for Justice - Badge

CRUDE OIL DERIVATIVES TRADERS CHARGED WITH MANIPULATION OF NYMEX CRUDE OIL FUTURES DURING EARLY 2008

InvestorLawyers

The Commodities Futures Trading Commission filed a case on May 24, 2011 alleging that certain commodities traders including Parnon Energy, Inc., Arcadia Petroleum Ltd. and Arcadia Energy (Suisse) SA (“Defendants”) violated the Commodities Exchange Act. The complaint alleges that defendants caused the price of futures and options contracts on West Texas Intermediate light sweet crude oil (“WTI”) traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) to be artificial by carrying out a cross-market trading scheme between January and April of 2008 involving the accumulation and sell-off of a substantial position in physical crude oil to manipulate futures prices.

During the relevant period Defendants allegedly traded futures and other contracts that were priced off of the price of WTI. WTI is delivered to commercial users at Cushing, Okla., a major crude oil delivery point. The price of WTI is a benchmark for crude oil prices around the world, and the supply of WTI at Cushing is an important driver of WTI price.

According to the allegations in the CFTC case, Defendants conducted a manipulative cycle, driving the price of WTI to artificial highs and then back down, to make unlawful profits. First, they allegedly purchased large quantities of physical WTI crude oil during the relevant period, even though they did not have a commercial need for crude oil. They allegedly purchased the oil pursuant to their scheme to dominate and control the already-tight supply at Cushing to manipulate the price of WTI upward and to profit from the corresponding increase in value of their WTI futures and options contracts on NYMEX and IntercontinentalExchange (“ICE”).

Next, once WTI reached artificially high prices and they had taken profits from their long WTI Derivative position, Defendants allegedly engaged in additional trading activity – selling more WTI Derivatives short at the artificially high prices.

Finally, defendants allegedly strategically sold off their physical holdings of WTI, mostly all on one day, to drive the WTI price back down and to profit from their short WTI Derivatives position.

Defendants allegedly realized profits from their WTI Derivatives trading that exceeded $50 million, according to the CFTC complaint.

Investors who believe that they may have been harmed by the alleged manipulative scheme may have the right to commence private litigation, and are welcome to contact the Firm to discuss their possible claims.

The CFTC complaint is accessible below.

Client Reviews

Chris did a great job with my case. He managed my expectations in the beginning of the process, consulted me along the way and always made sure I knew the advantages and disadvantages of decisions we collectively needed to make. He is very knowledgable about the finanical industry and how they work...

Greg

Chris displayed extreme professionalism. His dedication, research, and concern for his clients pocket book was displayed to the fullest when Chris tried my case. His diligence and perserverance were rewarded when we won our case. I have reccommended Chris to numerous friends who have concurred with...

Jay

Chris became my lawyer for a FINRA Arbitration case in 2008. He listened to my complaint, filed notice soon after and engaged an expert witness. We discussed mediation, found it to be agreeable and approached the defendant who at first agreed and at the last minute reneged. At all times Chris kept...

Andrew

Contact Us

  1. 1 Law Firm Accepting Cases Throughout the U.S.
  2. 2 Experienced Representation
  3. 3 Established Record of Substantial Recoveries
Fill out the contact form or call us at (866) 966-9598 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message