Published on:

Customers of barred broker or “financial advisor” Gabriel “Gabe” Block of Red Bank, New Jersey may have arbitration claims if Block caused the customers losses by recommending over-concentration of the customer’s accounts in stocks, excessive use of margin loans and/or trading in microcap stocks.

Piggybank in a Cage
According to BrokerCheck records kept by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Block has been subject to at least 12 customer complaints and five regulatory actions during his career.  Block is currently barred from the industry but was formerly employed by First Standard Financial Company LLC, National Securities Corp., and Oppenheimer & Company, among other brokerage firms.  Several of the customer complaints against Block concern allegations of high frequency trading activity also referred to as churning.

On August 28, 2015, The State of Delaware’s Investor Protection Unit filed an administrative complaint against Block, with the following allegations: churning, excessive trading, unsuitable investment recommendations, and narcotics use.  Block denied the Delaware allegations, but consented to a cease and desist order, and relinquished his right in the future to apply to be a broker or investment advisor in the state of Delaware.

Published on:

Investors in American Realty Capital New York City REIT (“ARC NYC REIT”), may have arbitration claims to be pursued before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), if their ARC NYC REIT investment was recommended by a financial advisor who lacked a reasonable basis for the recommendation, or if the nature of the investment was misrepresented by the broker or financial advisor.  According to its website, ARC NYC REIT is structured to provide its investors with a combination of current income and capital appreciation through strategic investments in high-quality commercial real estate located throughout the five boroughs of New York City.

Money Whirlpool
Recently a Tel Aviv, Israel based private real estate investment fund, Comrit Investments 1 LP (“Comrit”) — launched an unsolicited tender offer to purchase up to 1.6 million shares of ARC NYC REIT for $13.61 a share.  This is lower than a previous $14.68 per share tender offer, since expired, that Comrit made in early 2018

A publicly registered non-traded real estate investment trust (“REIT”), ARC NYC REIT was incorporated in December 2013 as a Maryland REIT and is registered with the SEC.  Accordingly, ARC NYC REIT was permitted to sell securities to the investing public at large, including numerous unsophisticated retail investors who bought shares through the initial public offering (“IPO”) upon the recommendation of a broker or money manager.

Published on:

Investors in Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT Inc. (“CVMC REIT I”) and/or Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT II Inc. (“CVMC REIT II”) may have FINRA arbitration claims, if their investment was recommended by a financial advisor who lacked a reasonable basis for the recommendation, or if the nature of the investment was misrepresented by the stockbroker or advisor.

money whirlpool
CVMC REIT I was incorporated on December 16, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT).  As a publicly registered non-traded REIT, CVMC REIT I was permitted to sell securities to the investing public at large, including unsophisticated retail investors who bought shares upon the recommendation of a broker or money manager.  CVMC REIT I began offering securities in December 2010 and terminated its offering in June 2014 after raising approximately $1.7 billion in investor equity.  CVMC REIT I invests in purpose-built facilities and owns a portfolio of 61 properties, as of the March 2019.

CVMC REIT II was incorporated on January 11, 2013 as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT).  As a publicly registered non-traded REIT, CVMC REIT II was permitted to sell securities to the investing public at large, including numerous unsophisticated retail investors who bought shares upon the recommendation of a broker or money manager.  CVMC REIT II began offering securities in May 2014, and after raising $1.2 billion in investor equity in its initial primary offering, CVMC REIT II launched a follow-on offering that terminated in November 2018 after raising an additional $86.9 million.  CVMC REIT II invests in net leased data centers and healthcare assets and owned a portfolio of 85 properties as of March 2019.

Published on:

Law Office of Christopher J. Gray, P.C. and co-counsel have filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada on behalf of all shareholders of The Parking REIT, Inc. “Parking REIT”) and MVP Monthly Income Realty Trust, Inc. (“MVP REIT I”) between August 11, 2017 and December 15, 2017.

On December 15, 2017, the merger of Parking REIT (then known as MVP REIT II, Inc.) and MVP REIT I (the “MVP Merger”) was consummated. The complaint is captioned SIPDA Revocable Trust v. The Parking REIT, Inc., et al. (Case No. 2:19-cv-00428-APG-NJK), and alleges that defendants solicited stockholders’ votes in support of the merger through proxy statements that omitted material facts necessary to make the statements therein not false or misleading. The complaint further alleges that stockholders were damaged as a result of the concealment of this material information.  The complaint is accessible via the link below.

19.3.12 complaint filed stamped

Published on:

Money MazeEarlier this month, a tender offer to purchase shares of Carey Watermark Investors Inc. (“Carey Watermark”), a publicly registered non-traded real estate investment trust managed by W.P. Carey Inc. (NYSE: WPC), was reportedly completed by a private investor known as Everest REIT Investors I LLC (“Everest”).

According to public SEC filings, the unsolicited offer to purchase up to 7.02 million shares of common stock, or roughly 5 percent of the outstanding shares of Carey Watermark, resulted in Everest’s  purchase of 48,831 shares for $7.50 each in its tender offer that expired on March 29, 2019.

Carey Watermark shares originally sold for $10.00 each and have an estimated net asset value  (NAV) of $10.41 as of December 31, 2017.

Published on:

The share price of American Finance Trust (“AFIN”), a REIT that published an estimated net asset value (NAV) of $23.56 a share before listing its shares on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”) in the summer of 2018, has continued to languish, reaching a market price as low as $10.08 in trading on April 12, 2019.

money whirlpool
As previously reported, on June 29, 2018, the board of directors of AFIN, formerly known as American Realty Capital Trust V, Inc., announced the approval of a plan to list AFIN common stock on the Nasdaq, and listed its shares effective July 19, 2018. Although most investors paid $25.00 a share for AFIN shares in the Company’s offerings, AFIN shares have consistently traded well below that price level since the Nasdaq listing.

Last year, a third party known as MacKenzie Realty Capital Inc. made two unsolicited tender offers to purchase AFIN shares for as much as $15.00 per Class A share- offers that AFIN’s board recommended shareholders reject.

Published on:

Investors in Healthcare Trust, Inc. (“HTI”), may have FINRA arbitration claims, if their investment was recommended by a financial advisor who lacked a reasonable basis for the recommendation, or if the nature of the investment was misrepresented by the stockbroker or advisor.

Money Maze
HTI was incorporated on October 15, 2012, as a Maryland corporation that elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT).  As a publicly registered non-traded REIT, HTI was permitted to sell securities to the investing public at large, including numerous unsophisticated retail investors who bought shares upon the recommendation of a broker or money manager.  HTI terminated its offering in November 2014 after raising approximately $2.2 billion in investor equity.  HTI invests in multi-tenant medical office buildings and owned a portfolio of 191 properties, as of the fourth quarter of 2018.

The Board of HTI has approved a $17.50 net asset value per share of the company’s common stock as of December 31, 2018, representing a decrease of nearly 13.6 percent compared with HTI’s December 31, 2017 estimated NAV per share of $20.25.   HTI originally sold shares to the public for $25.00 each.   HTI attributed the drop in its reported NAV to the effect of paying distributions to the company’s stockholders that net exceeded cash flows from operations and a $30.5 million decrease in the estimated value of its real estate assets compared to last year.  While this lower $17.50 estimated NAV is bad news for investors, the worse news may be that transactions in the limited secondary market have reportedly taken place at $12.75 to $13.00 a share- suggesting that HTI shares may be worth even less than the estimated NAV.

Published on:

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has filed charges Cardinal Energy Group, Inc. (“Cardinal”), a Texas-based oil and gas company, as well as and its former CEO Timothy W. Crawford (“Crawford”).  The SEC charges defendants with fraudulently concealing the loss of Cardinal’s major source of revenue.

Oil Drilling Rigs
In mid-2017, Cardinal reportedly lost control of its interest in two oil-and-gas leases that accounted for nearly all (approximately 90%) of the company’s revenue, according to the SEC’s complaint.  However, according to the SEC complaint, instead of revealing these issues, Cardinal and Crawford filed quarterly reports with the SEC that misrepresented to investors that the leases were still expected to be part of the company’s future business plans.

During this period, while allegedly concealing the setback to the business, Cardinal also allegedly raised additional money from investors, misreported stock ownership, and failed to make the required disclosures that its Crawford had sold millions of shares of Cardinal stock.

Published on:

Investors in Steadfast Apartment REIT, a publicly registered non-traded real estate investment trust or REIT, have an opportunity to sell their shares- but at a price far below the REIT’s estimated per-share value of $15.84 a share, or its initial $15.00 a share offering price.

building-199x300
According to Securities and Exchange Commission filings, Comrit Investments I, a Tel Aviv-based investment fund, has commenced an unsolicited tender offer.  Comrit has offered to purchase up to 337,268 shares of Steadfast Apartment REIT Inc. stock at a price of $11.86 per share in cash. The offer expires on March 28, 2019.

Steadfast Apartment REIT, a publicly listed non-traded REIT, invests in “multifamily properties” throughout the United States.  The REIT closed its public offering in March 2016 and has reportedly raised $788 million in investor equity, as of December 31, 2018. The REIT closed its public offering on March 24, 2016.  Steadfast Apartment REIT marketed itself as focused on purchasing established, stable apartment communities with operating histories that demonstrated consistently high occupancy and income levels across market cycles.  Despite its characteristic high offering fees and expenses, Steadfast Apartment REIT is purportedly worth slightly more than its offering price of $15.00 a share, with management estimating its NAV at $15.84 a share.  However, shares have reportedly recently traded in a limited secondary market at prices as low as $12.70 a share.

Published on:

A UBS Financial Services options trading program marketed as a “Yield Enhancement” strategy to brokerage customers of UBS, reportedly including risk averse investors with substantial bond portfolios, suffered substantial losses approaching 20% of the capital committed in late 2018 and early 2019, although customers to whom the strategy was sold had reportedly been under the impression that the maximum loss they faced in a given month was  1-2%.

Iron Condor Basics
This impression of minimal risk was borne out by UBS’s marketing materials for YES, which at least strongly suggested that the central trading strategy of YES- the Iron Condor– exposed the client to finite or limited risk.  For example, one UBS marketing presentation touted historic returns that featured very few months with losses, and many months with gains.  UBS marketing materials also characterized YES’s central strategy as follows: “selling short term out-of-the-money European style puts and calls on the S&P 500 Index.  To help mitigate downside and upside market exposure, short term below-market and above-market call options are purchased with the same duration as the puts and calls sold.”

Other UBS marketing materials summarize the strategy as follows: