Justia Lawyer Rating - Badge
NYSTLA - Badge
Avvo Rating - Badge
American Association for Justice - Badge

FINRA ORDERS UNITS OF MERRIL LYNCH TO PAY $8.1 MILLION

InvestorLawyers

Recent Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) securities arbitration resulted in the order for units of Merrill Lynch to pay compensatory damages to Staton Family Investments Inc. totaling $8.1 million for breach of fiduciary duty. Staton Family Investments and Daniel Staton accused Merrill Lynch of securities fraud, negligence, breach of contract and common stock theft. According to the claimants, 1,260,000 shares of Duke Realty Corp. common stock were stolen from their accounts.

Finra Orders Units of Merril Lynch to Pay $8.1 Million

Daniel Staton was found to not be personally affected, so he was dismissed as a claimant. When the claim was filed in December 2008, claimants requested more than $1 billion in restitution: $900 million in treble damages or 1,260,000 shares of the aforementioned stock, $300 million in compensatory damages, $50 million for punitive damages and other costs including attorneys’ fees.

The alleged wrongdoing occurred, according to the claimants’ lawyer, when Merrill Lynch failed to make Staton Family Investments adequately aware of the terms of certain trigger prices that could possibly reduce the value of Duke Realty’s stock to nothing. Around the time the stock dipped below the trigger price, another $4 million was requested from the family company by Merrill Lynch, while still not notifying them of how undercollateralized the loan was. Though Merrill Lynch only requested $4 million, the money they actually owed amounted to $23 million.

FINRA denied claims against individual respondents but also denied the individuals’ requests to have the arbitration proceedings removed from their CRD records. According to Bill Halldin, a Bank of America spokesman, Merrill Lynch did nothing wrong and he stated, “We are considering additional action in this matter, including asking a court to overturn this decision.”

The FINRA panel’s split decision came through on July 21, and satisfied neither the substantial sum requested by the claimants nor the respondents’ firm denial of wrongdoing.

Client Reviews

Chris did a great job with my case. He managed my expectations in the beginning of the process, consulted me along the way and always made sure I knew the advantages and disadvantages of decisions we collectively needed to make. He is very knowledgable about the finanical industry and how they work...

Greg

Chris displayed extreme professionalism. His dedication, research, and concern for his clients pocket book was displayed to the fullest when Chris tried my case. His diligence and perserverance were rewarded when we won our case. I have reccommended Chris to numerous friends who have concurred with...

Jay

Chris became my lawyer for a FINRA Arbitration case in 2008. He listened to my complaint, filed notice soon after and engaged an expert witness. We discussed mediation, found it to be agreeable and approached the defendant who at first agreed and at the last minute reneged. At all times Chris kept...

Andrew

Contact Us

  1. 1 Law Firm Accepting Cases Throughout the U.S.
  2. 2 Experienced Representation
  3. 3 Established Record of Substantial Recoveries
Fill out the contact form or call us at (866) 966-9598 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message