Justia Lawyer Rating - Badge
NYSTLA - Badge
Avvo Rating - Badge
American Association for Justice - Badge

FINRA RULING: EX-BROKER WILLIAM BAILEY SUSPENDED FOR TWO YEARS

InvestorLawyers

William Bailey, a former broker for NEXT Financial Group Inc., was suspended for two years in Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) securities arbitration. Bailey’s official cause for suspension, according to FINRA, was “unsuitable and excessive trading of mutual funds and variable annuities.” In addition, Bailey was charged with discretionary trading without prior written approval.

FINRA Ruling, Ex-Broker William Bailey Suspended for Two Years

Bailey’s broker misconduct took place over the span of nearly two years, from January 2006 to December 2007. His misconduct affected seven investors between the ages of 66 and 93. In addition, three customers were convinced by Bailey to hold their variable annuities for only a short time before switching them to new ones. FINRA determined that this was a violation to the broker’s suitability standard because it did not improve their financial situations and was not in keeping with their needs and financial objectives.

During this time period, Bailey recommended 484 “short-term mutual fund switch transactions,” according to FINRA. The average turnover for Bailey’s trades was only 60 days — a practice known as “churning.” Sales charges and trading fees for these 484 transactions amounted to $147,000 and Bailey’s commissions for these transactions amounted to more than $120,000. Currently, there is no mention of financial restitution and Bailey did not admit or deny wrongdoing.

With or without admission of fault, Bailey’s suspension does set an example, according to FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement Brad Bennett.

“Brokers who engage in excessive trading will be held accountable,” Bennett stated. “In this case, Mr. Bailey rapidly switched his elderly and unsophisticated customers in and out of mutual funds with high costs, providing a benefit to Bailey instead of to his customers.”

Churning is excessive trading of an investor’s account in order to generate broker commissions. If you believe that you, like William Bailey’s seven customers, are a victim of churning or unauthorized trading, you may have a valid securities arbitration claim and should contact Christopher J. Gray, P.C., for a no-cost, confidential consultation.

Client Reviews

Chris did a great job with my case. He managed my expectations in the beginning of the process, consulted me along the way and always made sure I knew the advantages and disadvantages of decisions we collectively needed to make. He is very knowledgable about the finanical industry and how they work...

Greg

Chris displayed extreme professionalism. His dedication, research, and concern for his clients pocket book was displayed to the fullest when Chris tried my case. His diligence and perserverance were rewarded when we won our case. I have reccommended Chris to numerous friends who have concurred with...

Jay

Chris became my lawyer for a FINRA Arbitration case in 2008. He listened to my complaint, filed notice soon after and engaged an expert witness. We discussed mediation, found it to be agreeable and approached the defendant who at first agreed and at the last minute reneged. At all times Chris kept...

Andrew

Contact Us

  1. 1 Law Firm Accepting Cases Throughout the U.S.
  2. 2 Experienced Representation
  3. 3 Established Record of Substantial Recoveries
Fill out the contact form or call us at (866) 966-9598 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message