securities fraud attorney

Published on: September 19, 2013

Morgan Stanley Fined by FINRA

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of customers of Morgan Stanley and other full-service brokerage firms regarding the sales of bonds and other securities. In some cases, full service brokerage firms may have failed to provide fair and reasonable prices or best execution in some customer transactions involving municipal bonds, corporate bonds, agency bonds or other securities.

According to a FINRA news release, on August 22, 2013, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fined Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC for failure to provide reasonable prices in certain municipal bond customer transactions and failure to provide best execution in certain corporate and agency bond customer transactions. The firms were fined $1 million and ordered to pay restitution and interest in the amount of $188,000, above and beyond what Morgan Stanley has already paid. Stock fraud lawyers say Morgan Stanley did not admit or deny the FINRA charges.

Reportedly, the violations affected 116 corporate and agency bond customer transactions and 165 municipal bond customer transactions.

Published on: September 10, 2013

Unsuitable Recommendation of ELKs Leads to Claims Against Citigroup

by InvestorLawyers

Unsuitable Recommendation of ELKs Leads to Claims Against Citigroup

ELKs are sometimes called reverse convertibles and can carry high risks. As a hybrid debt security, the return on this type of investment is linked to an underlying equity, most commonly a stock. Usually, ELKs mature in a year and, if the value of the ELK falls below a pre-set price, the investor will not receive cash but, instead, the investment is converted into shares in the underlying security. The value of these shares can be worth less than the investor’s initial investment. According to stock fraud lawyers, ELKs are structured products that are, in some cases, part of a speculative investment strategy that is unsuitable for many investors.

According to the Statement of Claim in this case, the 91-year-old female investor was allegedly sold an investment strategy that involved asset allocation that was unsuitable and materially flawed for an investor seeking conservation of principle. The claim is seeking $200,000 in damages for the investor and alleges fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unsuitable sales.

According to securities fraud attorneys, firms have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given his or her age, investment objectives and risk tolerance.

Published on: September 5, 2013

Behringer Harvard REIT I is Now TIER REIT: New Name Doesn’t Solve Investor Problems

by InvestorLawyers

Behringer Harvard REIT I changed its name on June 21, 2013, to TIER REIT, Inc.

Behringer Harvard REIT I is Now TIER REIT New Name Doesn’t Solve Investor Problems

Despite the name change which, according to the REIT’S president Scott Fordham was supposed to symbolize “how the company reflects the goals and objectives of its tenants and stockholders in everything it does,” investors continue to be trapped in an investment they can’t sell except at a significant discount on the secondary market. Furthermore, according to stock fraud lawyers, the REIT continues to pay zero distributions.

To make matters worse, the REIT’s latest SEC quarterly report disclosed some disturbing information for investors. Reportedly, notes payable amounting to approximately $221.8 million will come due in 2013 and this amount may increase significantly because of several of the REIT’s loans, which are in default. As a result, the REIT may have to pay over $300 million before the end of 2013 because of its outstanding loans. In addition, the REIT had cash and cash equivalents of only $40.7 million and $71.3 million in restricted cash as of March 31, 2013.

Published on: August 27, 2013

Securities Arbitration Investigations Continue as FINRA Files Formal Complaint Against Thompson National Properties

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys continue to investigate claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses in Thompson National Properties (TNP) promissory note investments. Specifically, investors may bave viable claims regarding three note programs sold by TNP from 2008 to 2012 that, according to a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) complaint dated July 30, 2013, allegedly were used in defrauding and deceiving investors. The complaint names Tony Thompson, Thompson National Properties LLC and TNP Securities LLC and is the first formal action against Thompson by FINRA.

According to stock fraud lawyers, $50 million in TNP-sponsored high-yield promissory notes were sold to investors, claiming guaranteed principal and interest. A summary of the allegations b7y FINRA in Mr. Thompson and TNP Securities’ BrokerCheck profile states that they “engaged in transactions, practices or courses of business which operated as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.” Furthermore, FINRA’s allegations against TNP Securities and Mr. Thompson include the use of deceptive, manipulative or other fraudulent devices, which allege4dly puts them in violation of FINRA Rule 2020 and the Exchange Act of 1934.

Specifically, the complaint discusses the TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program LLC, the TNP Profit Participation Program LLC and the TNP 12% Notes Program LLC.

Published on: August 20, 2013

SEC to Discuss Uniform Fiduciary Standard Rule for Brokers

by InvestorLawyers

According to a recent article in Investment News, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary Jo White, wants the SEC to decide as soon as possible whether to propose a rule that would raise the standards for investment advice given by brokers. Securities fraud attorneys say a rule of this kind would play a significant part in protecting investors and could make it easier to determine misconduct in securities arbitration.

SEC to Discuss Uniform Fiduciary Standard Rule for Brokers

Stock fraud lawyers expect the commission, which consists of five members, will be split on this controversial issue. A cost-benefit analysis is being conducted by the SEC regarding a potential rule. In an interview, SEC Commissioner Daniel Gallagher said the potential rule hasn’t been a “front burner issue,” but it soon will be.

“We really need to decide, based on what we’ve seen, whether it makes sense to move forward,” Gallagher stated.

Published on: August 8, 2013

GenSpring Clients Could Recover Losses

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses in their accounts with GenSpring Family Offices LLC, a firm owned by a wholly-owned SunTrust subsidiary. Reportedly, arbitration cases have already been filed on behalf of ultra-high-net-worth investors which allege mishandling of investment accounts by GenSpring.

GenSpring Clients Could Recover Losses

In one case, the investors’ trust interviewed multiple money managers and investment firms including Credit Sussie, CitiGroup, Deutsche Bank, LaSalle Bank and Goldman Sachs. All of these firms recommended diversification across traditional asset classes, such as bonds and equities, as well as selective investments in alternative products for special situations.

However, the claim asserts that GenSpring stood out because of its unique approach which would provide better downside protection and better returns through the use of Multi-Strategy Hedge Funds, such as Silver Creek Funds, instead of the bond or fixed income portion of client portfolios. Allegedly, GenSpring officials claimed that their approach, which had been tested thoroughly, would behave like traditional bonds in terms of asset class correlation and volatility while providing returns across all market cycles that were superior to traditional bonds. The trust invested approximately $10 million and stated its primary goal as capital preservation.

Published on: July 30, 2013

Investors Could Recover ATP Oil and Gas Note Losses

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses in ATP Oil and Gas 11.875 Percent Senior Second Lien Exchange Notes. The investigation is regarding whether customers received unsuitable recommendations of the ATP Notes from their full service brokerage firm or advisor.

Reportedly, a class action lawsuit was filed on May 24, 2013, on behalf of investors who acquired ATP Notes that can be traced to the company’s exchange of $1.6 billion in notes that occurred on December 16, 2010. According to the complaint, the company allegedly concealed two moratoriums while issuing the ATP Notes. These moratoriums were issued by the U.S. Department of Interior and regarded deep water drilling. Reportedly, the drilling devastated the revenues of the company, which filed for bankruptcy on August 17, 2012.

According to stock fraud lawyers, ATP Oil and Gas 11.875 Percent Senior Second Lien Exchange Notes were speculative investments that carried a very high risk. As a result, they were not suitable for investors with conservative portfolios, low risk tolerances or those seeking fixed income.

Published on: July 25, 2013

Wells Fargo Ordered to Pay Investor $2.8 Million

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of Wells Fargo Advisors LLC customers in light of a recent arbitration award regarding the firm’s alleged failure to detect theft and fraudulent transactions in a customer’s account. On July 3, 2013, a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel ordered Wells Fargo to pay an investor $2.8 million for the alleged failures.

Wells Fargo Ordered to Pay Investor $2.8 Million

The case was filed by a family limited partnership, College Health and Investment Ltd., in 2010. According to stock fraud lawyers, many wealthy families use family limited partnerships as an estate planning tool to minimize certain tax liabilities and preserve assets.

Reportedly, College Health filed a lawsuit in 2010 against Esther Spero. Spero allegedly forged the signatures of the family limited partnership’s employees who had authorization to transfer funds so that she could make transfers out of the accounts for her personal use. A $21 million judgement was entered in October, 2010, against Spero. Allegedly, Spero operated the scheme through multiple entities, including Wells Fargo.

Published on: July 9, 2013

Clients of Barry George Hartman, Rocky Mountain Financial, Could Recover Losses for Alleged Unsuitable Recommendations of REITs

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses as a result of doing business with Rocky Mountain Financial LLC, FSC Securities Corporation and Barry George Hartman. Some of Hartman’s clients have alleged that he made unsuitable recommendations of high-risk securities, such as AIG stock, and committed sales practice violations regarding non-traded REITs, or Real Estate Investment Trusts.

According to stock fraud lawyers, some non-traded REITs may have carried a high commission, which in the past has motivated brokers to recommend the product to investors despite the investment’s unsuitability. The commission on a non-traded REIT is often as high as 15 percent. Many non-traded REITs carry a relatively high dividend or high interest, making them attractive to investors. However, non-traded REITs are inherently risky and illiquid, which causes them to be unsuitable for many investors.

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules have established that firms have an obligation to fully disclose all the risks of a given investment when making recommendations, and those recommendations must be suitable for the individual investor receiving the recommendation given his or her age, investment objectives and risk tolerance. Furthermore, securities fraud attorneys say brokerage firms must, before approving an investment’s sale to a customer, conduct a reasonable investigation of the securities and issuer.

Published on: July 4, 2013

Merrill Lynch Fined for Agent’s Unsuitable Trading

by InvestorLawyers

Securities fraud attorneys are currently investigating claims on behalf of investors who suffered significant losses as a result of doing business with Matthew Becker and Merrill Lynch. Consent orders against Becker and Merrill Lynch were recently announced by the New Hampshire Bureau of Securities Regulation. According to the orders, Matthew Becker was not properly supervised by Merrill Lynch and, as a result of this failure, he was able to engage in short-term trading that was unsuitable for his clients.

Merrill Lynch Fined for Agents Unsuitable Trading

According to stock fraud lawyers, the investigation began when one of Becker’s clients filed a complaint with the bureau. The complaint alleged unsuitable and excessive trading by Becker in the client’s account. Reportedly, it wasn’t until five months after the complaint was received by Merrill Lynch, in September 2010, that Merril Lynch required heightened supervision of Becker.

“After a thorough investigation and review by Bureau auditor William Masuck, we determined that there was a basis for the client’s complaint of excessive trading, especially with regard to mutual funds and structured products,” says Deputy Director of Enforcement Jeff Spill. “These kinds of investments are not suitable for frequent, short-term trading.”